A U.S. federal judge vacated a Trump administration policy that imposed a $100,000 [1] fee on employers for new H-1B visa applications.

The ruling removes a significant financial barrier for companies seeking high-skilled foreign workers, potentially stabilizing the recruitment of international talent in the U.S. tech and healthcare sectors.

The decision came from a federal court in the District of Maryland, where an Obama-appointed judge said the fee was unlawful [1]. According to the court, the policy exceeded statutory limits and violated the Administrative Procedure Act [1, 2].

The contested rule, which surfaced in September 2023 [1, 2], sought to increase the cost of sponsoring foreign professionals. By striking down the fee, the court ensures that the financial requirements for the H-1B program remain aligned with existing laws rather than administrative mandates.

The H-1B visa program is subject to strict annual limits. The regular annual cap for these visas is 65,000 [2], while an additional annual cap of 20,000 [2] is reserved for those with advanced degrees.

Legal challenges to the fee argued that the administration lacked the authority to impose such a steep financial penalty on employers. The judge said the policy overstepped the legal boundaries set by Congress for visa processing fees.

A U.S. federal judge vacated a Trump administration policy that imposed a $100,000 fee on employers.

This ruling prevents the executive branch from unilaterally imposing massive financial levies on the H-1B visa process without congressional approval. By upholding the Administrative Procedure Act, the court reinforces the requirement that significant policy changes must follow a legal process and remain within statutory spending and fee limits, ensuring that the 85,000 annual visa slots remain accessible to employers regardless of the administration's fiscal goals.