Edmonton city councillor Keren Tang is requesting a city-commissioned study to determine how recent zoning changes affect infill property values [1].
The request comes as the city navigates the long-term effects of increasing residential density. Understanding whether these changes raise or lower property values will inform future policy decisions regarding urban development, and housing affordability [2, 3].
The city changed its zoning bylaw at the start of 2024 to allow for more infill development [1]. This policy shift was designed to increase the number of available housing units within existing neighborhoods by allowing developers to build more densely on single lots.
Currently, the zoning allows for a maximum of eight units per lot [4]. This cap has been a point of contention among city officials and residents. Recently, a motion to lower the infill cap from eight units to six units failed, meaning the limit remains at eight [5].
Councillor Tang's proposal for a study aims to provide empirical data on how these specific allowances impact the market value of surrounding residential properties [2]. By assessing the financial impact of the 2024 changes, the city can better balance the need for increased housing supply with the concerns of existing homeowners.
The discussion regarding these studies and the infill cap has occurred during council meetings, including a session on Feb. 17, 2024 [1, 2]. The outcome of any commissioned study would likely influence whether the city maintains the current eight-unit limit or considers further adjustments to the zoning bylaw [4, 5].
“Councillor Keren Tang is requesting a city-commissioned study to determine how recent zoning changes affect infill property values.”
This request reflects a broader tension in urban planning between 'missing middle' housing goals and the preservation of neighborhood character. If the study finds that high-density infill significantly alters property values—either positively through land speculation or negatively through perceived loss of amenity—it may provide the political cover needed to either expand or restrict current zoning caps.
