Karnataka Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao said there is no groupism within the Congress party leadership in Karnataka.

The statement aims to counter persistent narratives of factionalism among the state's top officials. Maintaining a public image of unity is critical for the party to ensure legislative stability and effective governance in the region.

Speaking in an interview with NDTV, Rao said he addressed rumors of internal conflict. He said the party remains cohesive and that its primary leaders are aligned in their goals. He specifically highlighted the relationship between two of the most influential figures in the state's political landscape.

"There is no groupism, Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar have worked together hand‑in‑hand over the past three years," Rao said [1].

The minister said this cooperation has been consistent over the last three years [1]. By framing the relationship as a partnership, Rao said he sought to reassure the public and party members that the leadership is not divided by competing interests.

This denial of factionalism comes as the party manages its administrative duties in Karnataka. The presence of strong, distinct personalities within a political party often leads to speculation about power struggles—a narrative Rao said he rejected during the interview.

By asserting that Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar have operated in tandem, the minister positioned the party as a unified front. This messaging is designed to project strength and reliability to the electorate, suggesting that internal harmony is a priority for the current administration.

"There is no groupism, Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar have worked together hand‑in‑hand over the past three years,"

The effort to publicly deny 'groupism' suggests that the Karnataka Congress is sensitive to perceptions of instability. In Indian state politics, visible friction between senior leaders can be exploited by opposition parties to suggest a government is fragile. By explicitly citing a three-year period of cooperation, the party is attempting to establish a track record of stability to neutralize claims of internal rivalry.