U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said a deal with Iran could be finalized within a few days [1].
The timing of these remarks is critical as the U.S. maintains a dual-track strategy of military pressure and diplomatic negotiation. While the U.S. has launched fresh defensive strikes in Iran, the administration is attempting to prevent a full-scale escalation through high-level talks.
Rubio said the comments on Sunday, May 24, during a diplomatic visit to India [2]. Negotiations are also taking place in Qatar, where mediators are working to bridge the gap between Washington and Tehran. The goal is to establish an agreement that would ease regional tensions following the recent military engagements.
There are varying estimates on the timeline for a resolution. Rubio said, "It could take a few days" [1]. In a separate statement, he said, "We could finalize the deal maybe today" [3].
Despite the ongoing military strikes, the U.S. intends to keep communication lines open. Rubio said, "We are keeping diplomacy alive despite the strikes" [4]. The strikes are described by officials as defensive measures intended to neutralize threats while the diplomatic process continues.
This approach reflects a strategy of leveraging military strength to secure more favorable terms in a ceasefire or long-term agreement. By maintaining the threat of force, the U.S. seeks to ensure that any resulting deal includes enforceable guarantees regarding Iran's regional activities.
“"It could take a few days."”
The simultaneous use of air strikes and diplomatic outreach suggests a 'coercive diplomacy' strategy. By striking targets while negotiating in Qatar and India, the U.S. is attempting to signal that its willingness to talk does not imply a lack of resolve or a cessation of military options. The success of this approach depends on whether Iran views the strikes as a catalyst for agreement or a provocation that precludes a deal.
