South Korea's National Assembly is operating as a "half-parliament" after the People Power Party launched a total boycott of legislative schedules [1].

The political stalemate threatens the country's ability to pass critical legislation and manage government oversight. With the opposition party controlling the agenda, the legislative process has effectively fractured along partisan lines.

The deadlock began after the Democratic Party unilaterally elected chairpersons for 11 standing committees [1]. This move followed a collapse in negotiations between the two major parties regarding the distribution of committee leadership positions [1].

The People Power Party has now maintained its boycott for two weeks [1]. The absence of the conservative party has left the assembly sparsely populated, preventing bipartisan deliberation on national policy.

Han Byung-do, the acting representative and floor leader of the Democratic Party, criticized the opposition's tactics. He said the time the People Power Party is wasting is the precious time of 50 million citizens [1].

Political observers are looking toward Constitution Day on July 17, 2024, as a potential turning point for the dispute [2]. The holiday serves as a symbolic deadline for the parties to resolve the leadership conflict, and restore full functionality to the legislature.

Despite the ongoing boycott, the Democratic Party continues to move forward with its legislative agenda through the newly appointed committee chairs. This strategy ensures that the assembly remains operational, though it lacks the consensus typically required for long-term policy stability [1].

The People Power Party has now maintained its boycott for two weeks.

The current gridlock reflects a deep systemic polarization within South Korean politics, where the minority party uses boycotts as a primary tool of resistance against a dominant legislative majority. By unilaterally filling committee seats, the Democratic Party is asserting its power to govern without consensus, while the People Power Party is attempting to delegitimize the resulting legislative output. The failure to reach a compromise before Constitution Day could signal a prolonged period of legislative instability.