South Korean police have initiated early personal protection for major party leaders after uncovering evidence of a planned terrorist act against Jung Chung-rae [1].

The move signals an escalation in security measures during a volatile election period, as authorities seek to prevent political violence and assassination attempts. This proactive security deployment follows the identification of a specific threat targeting a high-profile political figure.

Police action began during the first weekend following candidate registration [1]. The investigation was triggered by a report regarding a message in an election-related social networking service group chat, which suggested a mock assassination plan [1].

According to a report by YTN, the discovery of these plots prompted the police to expand their security umbrella beyond the immediate target. An anchor for YTN said that as evidence of a terror plot against Representative Jung was confirmed, police decided to provide early personal protection for leaders of major political parties [1].

Kim Kyu-hyun, speaking with YTN, said that a report was made because there was a conspiracy related to assassination in an SNS group chat related to the election [1]. Kim said that such incidents have occurred during previous presidential elections and other election cycles [1].

The South Korean police are continuing their investigation into the origins of the chat group and the individuals involved in the planning. The authorities have not yet released the names of the suspects or the specific nature of the planned attack, though the focus remains on the safety of political representatives during the current campaign cycle [1].

Police uncovered indications of a planned terrorist act against Jung Chung-rae.

The decision to provide early protection to multiple party leaders suggests that South Korean intelligence and police view the threat not as an isolated incident, but as a systemic risk associated with election-season polarization. By expanding security based on social media monitoring, the state is acknowledging that digital coordination of political violence has become a primary security vulnerability during democratic processes.