Ministers of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court are discussing a new Code of Ethics to strengthen professional standards within the judiciary.

The initiative comes as the court faces pressure to increase transparency and accountability. Establishing a formal ethical framework could redefine the behavioral expectations for the highest judges in Brazil, impacting how the court manages internal conflicts and public perception.

Minister Carmen Lúcia said the code is a necessary response to current challenges. She said that a report containing the proposal will be delivered to President Fachin well before the end of 2026 [1].

However, the process has not been without internal friction. Minister Gilmar Mendes said the way the discussions have been conducted was problematic [2]. Mendes said the code should have been presented to the ministers earlier, suggesting the current timing of the introduction was too late [2].

The disagreement highlights a tension between the drive for rapid reform and the desire for a more inclusive, deliberative process among the ministers. While Lúcia emphasizes the urgency of the response, Mendes focuses on the procedural flaws of the rollout [1], [2].

The final proposal is expected to address the conduct of ministers in their official and private capacities. Because the court holds significant power over the country's legal and political landscape, the adoption of a formalized code would mark a shift toward more rigid institutional oversight.

Supporters of the move argue that the lack of a codified ethical system leaves the court vulnerable to accusations of bias. Opponents or critics of the current process, like Mendes, said that the manner of its creation is as important as the rules themselves [2].

The code is presented as a necessary response to strengthen ethical standards within the Court.

The internal conflict over the Code of Ethics reflects a broader struggle within the Brazilian judiciary to balance institutional autonomy with public demands for transparency. By formalizing ethical rules, the STF seeks to insulate itself from political criticism, but the friction between ministers Lúcia and Mendes suggests that the court remains divided on how to implement these reforms without undermining the authority of individual ministers.