FIFA Chief Operating Officer Kevin Lamour said staff were deceived by Gianni Infantino's plan to sell stakes in competitions to private investors [1].
The internal conflict highlights a growing divide within the football governing body over the commercialization of the sport. Critics argue that shifting control to private equity could compromise the integrity of international competitions and the welfare of the organization's employees.
Lamour said that the proposal to sell stakes in FIFA competitions and commercial units was presented without transparency [1, 2]. According to reports from Geneva, the privatization plan left staff feeling blindsided by the leadership's strategy [2, 3].
Two senior FIFA officials have publicly criticized the plan [3]. These officials said the lack of transparency surrounding the private equity deal would harm the sport and the staff working within the organization [1, 2].
The dispute centers on the potential sale of commercial units, which would allow external investors to hold a financial interest in the world's most popular sport. This move marks a significant departure from the traditional non-profit structure of the governing body.
Lamour's public opposition reflects a broader sentiment among officials in Geneva who said the process was handled improperly [3]. The tension arises as the organization seeks new revenue streams while attempting to maintain its status as the global steward of football.
“staff were deceived by Gianni Infantino's plan”
This internal rift suggests a struggle for the soul of FIFA as it balances financial growth with its role as a non-profit regulator. If the organization pivots toward a private equity model, it may face increased pressure to prioritize short-term profits over long-term sporting development, potentially alienating member associations and staff.
