Iranian Parliament Speaker Garibaf said there is no reason to continue clinging to a memorandum with the United States because Iran sees no benefit [1].
This statement comes as both nations attempt to stabilize a volatile region through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to end hostilities and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The tension between the diplomatic agreement and Garibaf's rhetoric suggests a fragile peace, and internal Iranian skepticism regarding U.S. intentions.
Garibaf issued his remarks on July 15, 2026 [1]. He said the U.S. has exhausted its diplomatic options and that persisting with the existing memorandum makes no sense [1]. The speaker said that separating combat from negotiation would be a strategic mistake [1].
Despite these criticisms, a new MOU was signed on July 15, 2026 [1]. Reports indicate the agreement was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence [2]. The deal focuses on the cessation of hostilities, and the restoration of maritime traffic in one of the world's most critical shipping lanes.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Strait of Hormuz is slated to be fully opened on July 19, 2026 [3]. This reopening is intended to ease global energy markets and reduce the risk of direct military confrontation between the two powers.
Garibaf's public stance highlights a divide between the executive actions of signing treaties and the legislative view of U.S. reliability. He said if Iran is not gaining benefits, there is no reason to remain committed to the framework [1].
“"There is no reason to cling to the memorandum."”
The contradiction between the signing of the MOU and Garibaf's rhetoric indicates a high level of distrust within the Iranian government. While the executive branch may pursue a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz for economic and strategic relief, the legislative branch is signaling that any future cooperation is contingent on immediate, tangible benefits rather than long-term diplomatic promises.
