Eleven opposition party groups in Japan's Diet announced they will boycott all parliamentary deliberations after the ruling coalition advanced a seat-reduction bill [1].

This escalation threatens to paralyze the legislative process as the government pushes through key measures before the current session ends on July 17 [3]. The standoff centers on the ruling coalition's decision to move the House of Representatives seat-reduction bill into deliberations without securing the agreement of opposition parties.

Opposition leaders described the government's move as a disregard for the functions of the national parliament. Shigenori, the National Diet Affairs Committee Chair for the Center for Democratic Reform, said the move is a disregard for the Diet and that the Liberal Democratic Party lacks a self-purifying function [1].

In addition to blocking the seat-reduction bill, the opposition groups are demanding that Prime Minister Takaichi appear before the budget committee [1]. The Constitutional Democratic Party's National Diet Affairs Committee Chair said the move was a disregard for parliament, and that such a precedent must not be set [2].

Despite the general boycott, some contradictions exist regarding the extent of the refusal. While some reports state that opposition parties are rejecting all deliberations [1], other reports indicate that the Constitutional Democratic Party and the LDP's Diet affairs chairs agreed to enter deliberations and vote on the 2026 supplementary budget [4]. In the Upper House, the supplementary budget was slated for only one day of deliberation [4].

This legislative friction coincides with other pending measures, including a bill to criminalize the desecration of the national flag, which was scheduled for a vote on June 30 [1].

"国会軽視そのものでありますし、自民党がどうも、自浄作用がない"

The clash over the seat-reduction bill reflects a deeper struggle for control over the Diet's agenda. By bypassing opposition consent, the ruling coalition is attempting to streamline legislative goals, but the resulting boycott risks delegitimizing the resulting laws and delaying critical fiscal measures, such as the supplementary budget, as the session deadline approaches.