Senator Nelsinho Trad (PSD-MS) said a new conversation between Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and U.S. President Donald Trump is necessary.

The call for diplomacy comes as Brazil seeks to mitigate the economic impact of recent U.S. tariff measures. Because these tariffs threaten trade stability, a high-level dialogue is viewed as the primary mechanism to lower diplomatic tension and discuss possible reciprocity [1].

Trad, who serves as the president of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the remarks during an interview on CNN Brasil’s YouTube channel [1]. He said that direct communication between the two heads of state is the most effective way to address the current friction between the two nations.

The push for a new meeting occurs despite some signs of personal cordiality between the leaders. Reports indicate that President Lula and President Trump recently exchanged a handshake backstage at the G7 meeting in Évian, France [2]. While such gestures suggest diplomatic goodwill, Trad said that symbolic interactions are insufficient to resolve the specific policy disputes regarding trade barriers [1].

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is monitoring how these tariffs affect Brazilian exports. The goal of the proposed conversation is to find a diplomatic resolution that prevents a protracted trade conflict, one that could destabilize regional economic growth [1].

Trad said the conversation should focus on reducing the tension created by the U.S. tariff policy toward Brazil [1]. By opening a direct line of communication, both leaders could potentially negotiate terms that alleviate the pressure on Brazilian industries without escalating the trade dispute further [1].

A new conversation between Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and U.S. President Donald Trump is necessary.

This call for dialogue highlights a disconnect between symbolic diplomacy and actual trade policy. While a handshake at a G7 summit suggests a functional relationship, the imposition of tariffs indicates a more aggressive economic stance from the U.S. administration. If Brazil cannot negotiate a reduction in these tariffs through direct presidential intervention, it may be forced to implement reciprocal measures, which would further strain the bilateral relationship and impact global trade flows.