Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged activist Sonam Wangchuk to end his hunger strike and follow the advice of medical professionals [1].

The appeal comes as Wangchuk's health deteriorated during a fast centered on the ongoing paper-leak controversy. The intervention by the Prime Minister marks a significant moment in the standoff between the activist and the central government.

Modi addressed the situation by focusing on the physical toll of the protest. "I urge Sonam ji to follow the advice of doctors and end his fast," Modi said [1].

Wangchuk, who is around 60 years old [3], had been fasting in New Delhi [2]. While some reports indicated the strike lasted 19 days [2], other sources state the fast continued for 26 days [1]. The discrepancy in duration highlights the varying reports coming from the protest site during the health crisis.

Medical concerns grew as Wangchuk faced the risk of organ failure [4]. The government expressed concern over his deteriorating condition, which eventually led to the Prime Minister's public plea. This health crisis occurred against the backdrop of political tension regarding academic integrity, and examination leaks.

A spokesperson for the activist responded to the Prime Minister's request. "We welcome the Prime Minister's concern and will consider the advice," the spokesperson said [1].

The resolution of the strike follows a period of intense scrutiny. Some reports suggest the fast ended following the Prime Minister's announcement [1], while others point to the Delhi High Court directing that Wangchuk undergo daily health monitoring [2].

"I urge Sonam ji to follow the advice of doctors and end his fast."

The conclusion of Sonam Wangchuk's fast suggests a temporary shift from public protest to medical recovery, but the underlying issues—specifically the paper-leak controversy—remain unresolved. By framing the intervention as a matter of health rather than a political concession, the Modi administration manages the immediate crisis of a high-profile activist's potential death without formally committing to specific policy changes.