The Arewa community and pensioners in Osun State have endorsed Governor Ademola Adeleke as their preferred candidate for the 2026 governorship election [1].
This endorsement signals a strategic consolidation of support from minority ethnic groups and elderly citizens, two demographics that can influence the outcome of the upcoming race. The public backing comes amid increasing political tension as the state prepares for the vote.
Community members said the decision to support Adeleke was based on the positive impact his administration has had on their general welfare [1]. The endorsement took place within the Arewa community area of Osun State, where leaders and pensioners expressed their preference for the governor to continue his term [1].
This development occurs as the state moves toward the governorship election scheduled for Aug. 15, 2026 [2]. While the governor has secured this community's support, the political climate remains volatile due to allegations from opposing parties.
In a separate development, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has accused the Adeleke government of planning to procure arms for thugs ahead of the election [3]. The opposition party said the administration is planning a N2 billion procurement for this purpose [3]. These claims have added a layer of security concern to the electoral process.
Despite these accusations, the Arewa community and pensioners maintain that the governor's record of governance justifies their support [1]. The groups said the tangible benefits they have received under the current administration outweigh the political disputes between the governor and the APC.
“The Arewa community and pensioners in Osun State have endorsed Governor Ademola Adeleke”
The endorsement by the Arewa community and pensioners provides Governor Adeleke with a critical grassroots base, potentially neutralizing some of the influence of the APC. However, the simultaneous emergence of serious allegations regarding N2 billion in arms procurement suggests a highly polarized environment where administrative achievements are clashing with claims of electoral malpractice.





