Prince Andrew sublet three cottages on the Royal Lodge estate to generate personal income while living there almost rent-free [1].
The arrangement has drawn criticism because the Duke of York allegedly profited from crown-owned land while avoiding standard residential costs. This financial practice raises questions about the transparency and fairness of royal estate agreements.
According to reports released this month, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has resided at the Windsor estate for approximately 20 years [2]. During this period, he has paid what is described as a peppercorn rent, a nominal sum that is effectively rent-free [1]. While the prince maintained this low-cost living arrangement, he reportedly sublet three separate cottages on the grounds [1].
Danica De Giorgio of Sky News Australia described the situation as scandalous. "He has cashed in on the Royal Lodge estate by subletting three cottages, while only paying peppercorn rent on the residence himself," De Giorgio said [1]. She added that the former prince is currently "in a spot of bother" [1].
The reports suggest the subletting was used to create a stream of extra personal income [3]. The 66-year-old former prince has faced previous scrutiny regarding his finances and his relationship with the royal household [4].
Public records and media reports indicate that the income from these cottages went directly to the prince rather than the estate. This has led to public debate over whether those funds should be returned to the crown [4].
“He has cashed in on the Royal Lodge estate by subletting three cottages”
This revelation highlights the ongoing tension between the private financial interests of non-working royals and the public's expectation of accountability. By leveraging a low-cost lease to generate rental profit, Prince Andrew has created a perceived conflict of interest regarding the use of royal assets for personal gain.
