Congress MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi opposed the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill during parliamentary sessions in New Delhi on July 22, 2026 [1].
The opposition to the bill highlights a growing tension between the Indian government and civil-society organizations over the regulation of international funding. If passed, the amendment could significantly alter how non-governmental organizations operate and receive foreign grants.
Singhvi described the proposed legislation as "draconian" during debates in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha [1, 2]. He said the bill could be used to harass civil-society organizations and specifically target minorities [2].
According to Singhvi, the current parliamentary atmosphere is not conducive for such legislation [1]. He said the government is exhibiting political obstinacy in its approach to the bill [1].
The debate occurred amid broader unrest in Parliament, where the center and opposition have clashed over multiple issues, including the NEET-UG row [3]. Singhvi said that the timing and nature of the FCRA amendment reflect a desire to stifle independent oversight and NGO activity [1, 2].
Singhvi said the bill lacks the necessary safeguards to prevent political misuse of the regulatory framework [2]. He said that the restrictions would disproportionately affect those providing essential services to marginalized communities [2].
“The proposed legislation is 'draconian'.”
The opposition's challenge to the FCRA amendment reflects a broader global trend of tightening regulations on foreign funding for NGOs. By labeling the bill as a tool for harassment, the Congress party is framing the legislation as a political weapon rather than a fiscal regulatory measure, signaling a likely legislative deadlock and potential legal challenges if the bill is enacted.
