Senior Philippine military officials and security experts warned of an escalating political and informational war involving China in the West Philippine Sea.

This surge in hybrid warfare represents a strategic shift in the regional conflict, moving beyond physical maritime confrontations to target public perception and national security through digital means.

Officials said the conflict involves coordinated cyber-attacks, disinformation, and foreign influence operations. These activities are linked to China's continued illegal, coercive, and aggressive behavior in the disputed waters [1, 2]. The informational offensive aims to undermine the Philippines' position and legitimacy in its claims over the region [1, 3].

Security experts said the timing of these operations is critical as the country approaches a significant legal milestone. The Philippines is preparing for the 10-year anniversary of the 2016 arbitral ruling in July 2026 [1, 2]. The 2016 ruling provided the legal basis for the Philippines' maritime rights, but China has consistently ignored the decision [1].

Military officials said the deceptive behavior from China is designed to confuse the public and erode trust in government institutions. By deploying influence operations, the opposing force seeks to manipulate the narrative surrounding the West Philippine Sea, an area central to the nation's economic and security interests [2, 3].

Experts said the current environment requires a coordinated response to counter the spread of false information. The goal is to protect the integrity of national discourse and maintain international support for the legal framework established a decade ago [1, 2].

The Philippines is facing an escalating political and informational war involving cyber-attacks and disinformation.

The shift toward an 'information war' suggests that China is employing a multi-domain strategy to secure the West Philippine Sea. By combining physical coercion with digital disinformation, Beijing attempts to weaken the Philippines' domestic resolve and international standing ahead of the 2016 ruling's anniversary. This indicates that the maritime dispute is no longer just about territory, but about controlling the global and local narrative of legitimacy.