Greens Senator says AUKUS submarines cannot protect trade lanes

Sen. David Shoebridge (Greens) said the AUKUS nuclear-submarine deal will not enable Australia to defend its global sea-trade lanes ^[1].

The critique challenges the foundational logic of the defense pact, suggesting that the massive investment fails to address the actual security needs of the Indo-Pacific region ^[2].

Speaking on ABC’s ‘Insiders’ this Sunday, Shoebridge questioned the capability of the Australian military to secure trade routes regardless of the equipment acquired ^[1]. He said it is ridiculous to think Australia’s military could defend the nation’s global trade lanes ^[2].

Shoebridge argued that the strategic focus of the deal is flawed and potentially dangerous. He said acquiring nuclear-powered submarines under AUKUS only invites Australia to a conflict between the U.S. and China ^[2].

The senator further questioned the stated threat posed by China, suggesting that the current approach is more about symbolism than practical security. He said the country needs a realistic defense strategy for the Indo-Pacific, not a symbolic deal that doesn’t protect sea-trade lanes ^[1].

Beyond defense, Shoebridge used the interview to discuss other legislative priorities. These included the current budget bill, funding for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), and national housing policy ^[1].

Throughout the discussion, the senator emphasized a shift in priorities toward domestic stability and a more cautious approach to international military alliances. He said the current trajectory of the AUKUS agreement ignores the reality of Australia's limited capacity to project power across distant ocean lanes ^[2].