The Delhi High Court criticized the Wrestling Federation of India for declaring wrestler Vinesh Phogat ineligible for domestic events and Asian Games selection trials.
This ruling marks a significant legal intervention in the ongoing conflict between elite Indian athletes and their governing body. Because Phogat is a high-profile competitor, her exclusion could diminish India's medal prospects at the upcoming Asian Games.
During the proceedings on June 22, 2026 [1], the court bench described the decision by the Wrestling Federation of India as a "national shame" [2]. The court found the exclusion of Phogat to be arbitrary and potentially detrimental to the country's sporting success.
In response to the situation, the court directed the Centre to explore steps to facilitate her participation in the Asian Games trials [3]. The bench emphasized the need for a fair selection process to ensure the most qualified athletes represent the nation.
Sanjay Singh, President of the Wrestling Federation of India, disputed that there was a conflict regarding the wrestler's status. "There is no issue from our end," Singh said [4].
Despite the WFI's assertion, the court maintained its critical stance toward the federation's handling of the matter. The judicial body sought to ensure that administrative decisions do not obstruct the career of a top-tier athlete, particularly when international competition is at stake.
The Centre now faces the task of coordinating between the federation and the athlete to resolve the eligibility dispute before the trial deadlines pass.
“"The decision of the Wrestling Federation of India is a national shame."”
This judicial rebuke highlights the tension between sports federations' administrative authority and the rights of athletes to compete. By labeling the WFI's actions a "national shame," the court has shifted the narrative from a technical eligibility dispute to a matter of national interest, potentially forcing the WFI to standardize its selection criteria to avoid further legal challenges.
