Independent Senator David Pocock said Sunday he is open to forming a new political party composed of independents [1, 2].

The move signals a potential shift in the Australian political landscape, as a prominent independent considers formalizing a collective structure to challenge established party dynamics.

Pocock said he did not rule out the possibility of running for a lower-house seat in the future [1, 2]. This potential transition from the Senate to the House of Representatives would mark a significant change in his legislative strategy.

The senator based his decision on the current mood of the electorate. He said Australians are frustrated with a political system that "does not work for them" [1].

Pocock said the potential formation of a new party is a direct response to the influence of groups such as One Nation [1, 2]. By organizing independents into a formal party, he suggests a way to provide a structured alternative for voters who feel alienated by the existing major and minor parties.

While he has not yet committed to a specific timeline for the party's launch, the senator said the door remains open for such a development [1, 2]. The discussion involves other independents who may be interested in a shared platform to increase their collective bargaining power, and visibility within the government.

This development comes as a growing number of independent candidates have successfully challenged traditional party strongholds in recent election cycles. Pocock's potential leadership of a formal independent party could consolidate these disparate voices into a more cohesive political force.

Australians are frustrated with a political system that "does not work for them".

The potential transition of Independent Senator David Pocock from a lone actor to a party leader reflects a broader trend of voter disillusionment with Australia's two-party system. If a formal party of independents is established, it could create a permanent 'third force' in parliament, potentially holding the balance of power more consistently and forcing major parties to negotiate more deeply on policy issues to secure legislation.