Hardline members of the Democratic Party of Korea gathered at a National Assembly discussion hall to demand the total abolition of the prosecution's supplementary investigation powers [1].
This movement signals a growing internal rift within the party between those favoring a cautious approach and those demanding immediate, sweeping reform. The outcome could determine the party's strategic direction ahead of future general and presidential elections.
Rep. Jung Chung-rae, a former leader of the Democratic Party, led the push for a unified front against the so-called "cautionary theory" [1]. This theory suggests maintaining some of the prosecution's investigation powers rather than eliminating them entirely. Jung said that if prosecutorial reform is not achieved, the party will face difficulties in the next general and presidential elections [1].
The lawmakers are pressuring President Lee Jae-myung to provide a clear and definitive position on the matter [1]. The group said that ambiguity on this issue undermines the party's commitment to reform and risks alienating its core base.
Meanwhile, the People Power Party responded to the internal Democratic dispute by saying that the president himself must be the one to clarify his position [1]. This response places the burden of leadership and decision-making directly on the presidency.
During related discussions, commentator Rhyu Si-min said "no comment" [1].
““If prosecutorial reform is not achieved, the next general and presidential elections will be difficult,” said Jung Chung-rae.”
The clash between the 'cautionary' wing and the hardline faction of the Democratic Party highlights a critical tension in South Korean politics: the balance between judicial stability and systemic reform. By linking the issue to future electoral success, hardliners are framing prosecutorial reform not just as a legal necessity, but as a political survival requirement for the current administration.
