President Lee Jae Myung convened a public policy forum on Thursday, July 23, 2026 [1], to discuss new real-estate measures in Seoul.

The gathering aims to address the volatility of the housing market, where soaring prices and speculation have created significant barriers to affordability for the general public. By soliciting direct input from citizens and experts, the administration seeks to balance market stability with social equity.

The forum took place at the Blue House, the presidential office complex [2]. During the session, Lee focused on the necessity of curbing housing speculation to prevent artificial price inflation. This approach involves evaluating the current tax structure to determine if existing laws are sufficient to deter speculative buying.

One primary measure under consideration is the implementation of tougher property-holding taxes [3]. These taxes would target owners of multiple properties, potentially increasing the cost of maintaining non-primary residences. The administration believes that increasing the financial burden on speculators will encourage the release of properties back into the market, thereby increasing supply.

Lee said the goal of the forum was to gather public input on housing policy to ensure that future regulations are both effective and fair. The discussion also touched upon broader housing affordability, specifically for young adults, and first-time buyers who have been priced out of the metropolitan market.

Government officials are now reviewing the feedback gathered during the forum to refine the legislative approach. The administration intends to use these insights to draft a comprehensive strategy that addresses both the demand for affordable housing and the systemic issues driving speculation [3].

President Lee Jae Myung convened a public policy forum on Thursday, July 23, 2026

This policy shift indicates a move toward more aggressive government intervention in the South Korean property market. By focusing on property-holding taxes, the administration is attempting to pivot from simply increasing housing supply to actively disincentivizing the ownership of multiple homes, which is a common driver of urban housing bubbles.