Historian Criticizes Past Papacy on Spanish Television

Historian Mikel Herrán described popes who opposed Leo XIV as reactionaries, bloodthirsty, genocidal, and fanatics during a recent television appearance ^[1].

The commentary highlights a growing critical discourse regarding the historical role of the papacy in consolidating institutional power through conflict. By framing these figures in such stark terms, Herrán contrasts the violent history of the church with the perceived progressive nature of the modern papacy.

Speaking on the program "El Intermedio" on the Spanish network La Sexta, Herrán said the ideological divide between different eras of church leadership was significant ^[1]. He said the papacy historically strengthened its authority over the centuries by sowing discord ^[1]. This strategy, according to Herrán, allowed the institution to maintain control by creating opposition and conflict.

June 11 served as the date for the broadcast and the publication of the accompanying report ^[1]. The segment sought to provide historical context for the evolution of the Catholic Church's leadership and its relationship with political and social power.

Herrán's analysis focused on the specific figures he labeled as "anti Leo XIV" to illustrate a pattern of fanaticism ^[1]. He said the consolidation of power was not merely administrative but was often achieved through aggressive and violent means.

This critique of the church's history appeared as part of a broader discussion on the shift toward more progressive leadership in the current era ^[1]. The program used Herrán's historical expertise to challenge traditional narratives of the papacy's development.