President Donald Trump said the U.S. and Iran are getting closer to a framework agreement to end the ongoing war.

A deal would stabilize one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints and halt hostilities that have lasted 84 days [2]. The conflict has disrupted global oil markets and increased regional volatility.

Trump said on May 23 that the two nations are getting a lot closer to an agreement to end the war [1]. He said that "time is on our side" [0]. While some reports suggested a decision on the framework could be reached within 48 hours [1], other sources indicated a completion announcement could arrive within a few hours [5].

Diplomatic efforts are centering on the Strait of Hormuz. Two regional officials said that Iran has offered to end its chokehold on the strait in exchange for the U.S. lifting its blockade [3]. This exchange is a primary goal for Tehran, which seeks to restore commercial flow through the waterway.

Despite the diplomatic progress, tensions remain high. U.S. media reports have raised the prospect that Washington may be considering new strikes [2]. Meanwhile, Iranian officials said certain U.S. requirements are "excessive demands" [2].

The human cost of the conflict continues to mount. Reports indicate that two children died during a strike on a school in Minab [2]. These casualties underscore the volatility of the operational zones even as high-level talks proceed.

The U.S. objective remains a framework that limits Iran's regional influence, while Iran focuses on the immediate removal of economic and maritime restrictions [3, 4].

"The US and Iran are getting a lot closer to an agreement to end the war."

The potential agreement represents a strategic pivot to avoid a protracted war of attrition. By linking the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to the lifting of the U.S. blockade, both nations are using their primary economic levers to force a diplomatic resolution. However, the contradiction between peace talks and the possibility of new U.S. strikes suggests that military pressure remains a tool of negotiation rather than a discarded option.