Argentina's Federal Oral Tribunal No. 4 sentenced former officials Julio De Vido and José López to five years in prison on Monday [1], [2].

The ruling concludes one of the earliest and most significant corruption investigations into the Kirchnerist government, involving the fraudulent administration of public infrastructure projects.

The court found the former officials guilty of bribery and fraudulent administration related to the expansion of the Transportadora Gas del Norte and Transportadora Gas del Sur pipelines between 2004 and 2006 [2], [3]. In addition to the prison terms, the tribunal imposed a perpetual disqualification from holding public office [2].

This verdict follows a judicial process that spanned 22 years [2]. The case involved a total of 30 defendants who faced trial for their roles in the Skanska scandal [4]. The legal proceedings focused on the diversion of millions of dollars through fraudulent contracts, a scheme that characterized the first major corruption scandal of the era.

Federal prosecutor Carlos Stornelli said the defendants had a "rol decisorio y trascendente en el entramado de desvíos millonarios," or a decisive and transcendent role in the network of millionaire diversions [3].

The court's decision on July 13, 2026, marks the finality of the sentencing phase for the primary figures involved [1], [2]. While the trial had seen various delays and final statements from defendants through June, the tribunal has now formally issued the penalties [1], [4].

The sentencing of De Vido and López serves as a legal bookend to a period of governance marked by high-profile infrastructure spending and subsequent allegations of systemic graft [2].

Sentenced to five years imprisonment and perpetual disqualification from public office

The conviction of high-ranking officials from the early 2000s underscores the long-term legal volatility of the Kirchnerist era. By securing sentences for bribery and fraudulent administration after more than two decades, the Argentine judiciary signals that statutes of limitations and political shifts may not shield former officials from accountability for systemic corruption in public works.