The Argentine government has implemented new regulations governing the sale of vapes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches [1].

This move seeks to address a long-standing informal market and mitigate the health risks associated with nicotine consumption, particularly among teenagers [1, 5]. By shifting from a period of prohibition to a regulated framework, the government aims to gain oversight of product quality and distribution.

Health authorities have expressed concern over the lack of evidence regarding the safety of these products. The World Health Organization said there are not enough scientific proofs to ensure vapes are a real alternative for quitting smoking and noted they are not safe, especially for adolescents [4].

While Argentina moves toward regulation, other regional neighbors have taken different paths. In Mexico, a total ban on the commercialization, advertising, and propaganda of vapes was published in the Official Gazette [3]. This prohibition officially took effect on Jan. 16, 2026 [2].

However, the effectiveness of such bans is debated. An analyst cited by MSN said the prohibition of vapes in Mexico has been a measure "of paper, without real impact, and that does not benefit anyone" [6].

Financial measures are also being explored in the region to curb usage. In Peru, a proposed bill seeks to apply taxes of up to 100% on the sale price of vapes [7]. This approach focuses on economic deterrence rather than a total ban or simple regulation.

Argentina's new rules arrive after years of prohibitions that failed to stop the flow of unregulated products into the country [1]. The government now prioritizes a legal structure that allows for monitoring and taxation over the previous strategy of total restriction.

“The government now prioritizes a legal structure that allows for monitoring and taxation.”

The shift in Argentina reflects a broader regional tension between total prohibition and regulated legalization of nicotine alternatives. While Mexico attempts a hard ban, Argentina is betting that formal regulation will reduce the health risks of the black market and provide a mechanism for state oversight and revenue.