One Nation Victorian MLC Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell and other conservative leaders are calling for Australia to add nuclear power to its energy mix.
This push represents a significant challenge to current government energy policies and highlights a growing divide over how the nation should achieve energy security and emissions targets.
Tyrrell joined other conservative figures, including Angus Taylor and Pauline Hanson, in advocating for the technology. The push focuses on the potential for nuclear energy to provide stable, baseload power to the grid as the country transitions away from older energy sources.
Critics of the current administration argue that there is a contradiction in the government's approach to nuclear energy. Specifically, conservative leaders pointed to a billion-dollar deal [1] to export uranium to India as evidence that the government recognizes the value of nuclear fuel while refusing to utilize the technology domestically.
The debate over nuclear power in Australia has remained a contentious political issue due to long-standing bans and environmental concerns. However, the current advocates suggest that these positions are outdated and ignore the successes of nuclear programs in other developed nations.
Tyrrell and her colleagues said the shift is necessary to ensure the economy remains competitive. They argue that relying solely on renewables may create instability in the energy market during peak demand periods.
While the Labor government has previously expressed opposition to nuclear power, the pressure from the conservative wing continues to mount. The argument centers on the idea that Australia possesses the natural resources required to sustain a domestic nuclear industry, making the export of uranium without domestic application a missed opportunity for the national grid.
“Calls for Australia to add nuclear power to its energy mix”
The push for nuclear energy by One Nation and other conservatives signals a strategic attempt to pivot the national energy conversation toward baseload stability. By highlighting the contradiction between uranium exports and domestic bans, these politicians are attempting to frame the current energy policy as economically inconsistent rather than just environmentally cautious.


