Barnaby Joyce, a One Nation MP and former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, said proposed changes to the capital gains tax will not work.

These reforms represent a significant shift in Australia's fiscal approach to asset growth. If implemented, the changes could alter investment incentives across the country and spark a broader ideological battle over the role of government in wealth redistribution.

Speaking during an interview with Sky News Australia in Sydney, Joyce said the Albanese government's plans are "socialist" and a "death tax" [1, 2]. He said the reforms are ideologically driven and would discourage investment while increasing the overall tax burden on citizens [1, 2].

Joyce specifically targeted the government's rumored plan to scrap the current 50% capital gains tax discount [3]. He also said a proposed shift back to a pre-1999 indexation model for the tax was problematic [3].

"It’s got more hairs than a Greek cook; this is not going to work," Joyce said [1].

Beyond the technical aspects of the tax code, Joyce used the interview to criticize the government's communication strategy. He said the administration had sidelined certain officials in favor of others to deliver the news to the public.

"Poor old Uncle Jim, they have sort of hidden him in a cupboard, and they wheeled out Chris Bowen to do the press conferences," Joyce said. He said this was "like wheeling out the grim reaper to go fix up the emergency department at the hospital" [1].

Joyce said the proposed reforms are ineffective and will fail to achieve their intended economic goals due to their nature [1, 2].

"It’s a ‘death tax’ and it’s socialist."

The debate over the capital gains tax discount touches on a fundamental tension in Australian economic policy: the balance between encouraging private investment and ensuring tax equity. By framing the reform as a 'death tax' and 'socialist,' Joyce is positioning the One Nation party against the Albanese government's perceived move toward a more aggressive redistribution of wealth, which may mobilize voters concerned about property and asset devaluation.