Bill Gates testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, June 10, 2026 [1], regarding his past interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.

The testimony comes as lawmakers investigate Epstein's network and the potential influence he held over high-profile figures. Because Gates is one of the world's most prominent philanthropists, his relationship with the convicted felon has drawn scrutiny regarding the nature of their associations.

During the closed-door hearing on Capitol Hill, Gates said he had no knowledge of Epstein's illegal conduct [2]. He described the decision to meet with Epstein as a “grave error in judgment” [3].

Gates also addressed the dynamics of their relationship, saying that Epstein attempted to use personal information to manipulate him. "He tried to use information about my personal life, including my infidelities, to pressure me," Gates said [2].

These statements follow a long history of public interest in Epstein's network, including his conviction in 2008 [4]. The House Oversight Committee sought to clarify whether Gates was influenced by Epstein or had any knowledge of the crimes associated with the network.

While Gates maintained he was unaware of the illegal activities, the testimony was not without contention. Some Democrats said Gates has not been fully forthcoming with lawmakers about his ties to Epstein [5].

Gates said his interactions were limited and that he did not support or facilitate Epstein's activities. He reiterated that the association was a mistake that he regretted [3].

“"Meeting Epstein was a grave error in judgment."”

This testimony represents an attempt by Bill Gates to legally and publicly distance himself from Jeffrey Epstein's criminal legacy. By framing the relationship as a 'grave error' and alleging that Epstein used personal secrets as leverage, Gates is positioning himself as a target of manipulation rather than a collaborator. However, the disagreement between Gates's testimony and the views of some committee members suggests that lawmakers may still seek further evidence to determine the full extent of their association.