Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee member Megan Greene said interest rate cuts should remain a distant prospect due to elevated inflation risks.
This stance signals a cautious approach from the UK's central bank as it navigates volatile global economic conditions. If the bank eases policy too early, it risks allowing inflation to become entrenched, particularly as external shocks disrupt the supply of goods and energy.
Speaking on Bloomberg Television’s Odd Lots podcast on April 17, 2024, Greene said how the bank is responding to supply-side shocks. She highlighted geopolitical instability, noting that the recent tensions in the Middle East could pose a risk to the inflation outlook [1]. These disruptions, including energy volatility, create a complex environment for monetary policy, one that requires a steady hand to ensure price stability.
Greene said that supply-side shocks require a cautious approach to rate cutting [2]. This hawkish perspective aligns with broader expectations that the Bank of England base rate would be held at 3.75% [3]. The cautiousness is not unanimous across the committee; some members may prefer even tighter policy to combat persisting price pressures.
Reports indicate that at least two Monetary Policy Committee members are expected to vote for a rate hike [3]. This internal division underscores the difficulty of balancing economic growth with the mandate to keep inflation under control. Greene's remarks emphasize that until the impact of these transitory shocks is fully understood, the bank is unlikely to pivot toward a more accommodative stance.
By focusing on the supply side, Greene is pointing to factors outside the bank's direct control, such as shipping disruptions or oil price spikes, that can drive up costs for consumers regardless of domestic interest rate levels. The bank must therefore wait for clear evidence that these pressures are receding before lowering the cost of borrowing.
“Interest rate cuts should still be a way off.”
The Bank of England is prioritizing inflation control over immediate economic stimulus. By emphasizing supply-side shocks, the BOE is signaling that external geopolitical volatility may keep borrowing costs high for longer than markets initially anticipated, as the bank fears a premature rate cut could reignite price growth.





