Ending the 6x1 work schedule in Brazil could increase operational costs for bars and restaurants by as much as 20% [1].
This shift in labor policy threatens the profit margins of the hospitality sector by increasing labor charges and altering traditional working hours. Because the industry relies heavily on consistent staffing for daily operations, a reduction in the working week may force owners to hire more staff to maintain current service levels.
José Eduardo Camargo, the content leader of the Brazilian Association of Bars and Restaurants (Abrasel), said the potential cost increase could reach 20% [1]. He said that the removal of the 6x1 scale—where employees work six days and have one day off—directly impacts the financial viability of small and medium-sized establishments.
The association argues that the current proposal by the government fails to account for the specific needs of the food and beverage industry. Paulo Solmucci, the executive president of Abrasel, said the intention of the government to end the 6x1 scale is irresponsible.
According to Abrasel, the change in the work journey would lead to higher payroll expenses, and increased labor liabilities. The organization suggests that such a steep rise in costs could lead to higher prices for consumers or a reduction in staff numbers to offset the expenses.
While other sectors face different impacts—such as projections that bus fares could rise by eight percent—the hospitality sector remains one of the most vulnerable to these changes [1]. Abrasel continues to advocate for a model that balances worker well-being with the economic reality of business owners.
“"The end of the 6x1 scale can raise operational costs by up to 20%."”
The debate over the 6x1 work schedule reflects a broader tension in Brazil between labor rights and economic sustainability. If the government mandates a shorter work week without providing subsidies or tax relief, the hospitality sector may see a wave of price hikes or business closures, as these establishments typically operate on thin margins and cannot easily automate labor.



