The Brazilian House of Representatives installed a special committee on Wednesday to analyze a proposal to end the 6x1 work schedule [1].
This move represents a significant shift in labor policy that could reshape the working conditions for millions of employees across the country. By challenging the standard practice of six consecutive workdays followed by one day off, the proposal seeks to modernize labor laws and improve worker well-being.
The commission consists of 38 deputies [2]. House President Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB) defined the composition of the group, which is presided over by Rep. Alencar Santana (PT-SP) and features Rep. Leo Prates (Republicanos-BA) as the rapporteur [1].
The installation session took place at 2 p.m. on April 29 [3]. The committee is tasked with debating the viability of the Proposed Amendment to the Constitution (PEC), specifically focusing on how companies will adapt to the change and what forms of compensation might be necessary for employers [1].
To build broader support for the measure, the committee leadership plans to hold public hearings in several regions. These hearings are scheduled to take place in São Paulo, Paraíba, Minas Gerais, and Rio Grande do Sul [4].
Rep. Leo Prates said there is a need for compromise to ensure the measure passes the legislative hurdle. "We need to seek a 'middle text' to achieve the approval of the deputies," Prates said [5].
The legislative timeline is moving quickly, with the House aiming for a potential plenary vote as early as May [6]. This accelerated pace reflects the high level of public and political interest in the reform.
“The commission consists of 38 deputies.”
The creation of this commission signals a formal legislative attempt to dismantle one of Brazil's most rigid labor structures. By seeking a 'middle text,' lawmakers are attempting to balance worker quality-of-life improvements with the economic concerns of the business sector, particularly regarding operational costs and staffing levels. The decision to hold regional hearings suggests the government is treating this as a populist issue that requires grassroots validation before a final vote.
