The Brazilian Congress postponed voting on a constitutional amendment to end the 6x1 work schedule on June 15, 2026 [2].

This delay stalls a significant shift in labor laws that would impact millions of workers. By pausing the vote, the legislature is effectively delaying a decision on labor rights, artificial intelligence regulation, and the legal status of app-based workers.

The postponement occurred within the Chamber of Deputies' Commission on Constitution and Justice (CCJ) in Brasília [1]. The delay followed a collective request for a "pedido de vista," or a request for view, filed by leaders from the PSDB and PL parties [1].

This procedural move comes as the legislature approaches its parliamentary recess. Political analysts said the timing is tied to calculations intended to avoid electoral risk during a sensitive political climate [3].

Beyond the 6x1 schedule, the CCJ also delayed pending legislation regarding the regulation of artificial intelligence and the framework for app-based labor [1]. These votes were expected to provide clarity on the digital economy, and worker protections in the modern gig economy.

The debate over the 6x1 schedule has drawn significant attention from the private sector. Sixty business entities have expressed plans to influence the discussions surrounding the amendment [4]. These organizations seek to modify the proposal to allow for different work schedules, and specific labor limits based on the sector and region [4].

Legislative leaders, including those from the PSDB and PL, have utilized these procedural tools to slow the momentum of the labor reform [1]. The shift in timing means these critical votes may not occur until after the upcoming elections [3].

The Brazilian Congress postponed voting on a constitutional amendment to end the 6x1 work schedule.

The postponement reflects a strategic effort by conservative and centrist blocs to neutralize potentially volatile labor issues before an election cycle. By delaying the PEC 6x1 and AI regulations, the Congress avoids taking a definitive stance that could alienate either the industrial lobby or the working-class electorate during a peak campaign period.