The Brazilian federal government signed a provisional measure to eliminate a 20% federal tax on international purchases valued up to U.S. 50 [1].
This policy change targets the cost of low-value imports, commonly referred to as the "blusinhas" tax. By removing this levy, the administration aims to make international shopping more affordable for Brazilian consumers and reduce the final cost of goods.
Reports said the removal of the 20% tax rate [1] is expected to reduce the final price of these purchases by approximately 17% [1]. The measure specifically applies to international transactions conducted by consumers within Brazil for items that do not exceed the U.S. 50 threshold [1].
However, the status of the measure has seen conflicting reports. While some sources said the provisional measure has already been signed to ensure the tax is revoked [1], other reports suggest the Lula administration is still evaluating the possibility of the repeal [2].
Internal government alignment on the decision also remains a point of contention. Some reports said a consensus was reached through the signing of the measure [1], while others indicate the government remains divided over whether to end the tax entirely [3].
Despite these contradictions, the primary goal of the initiative is to lower the financial burden on citizens purchasing small items from overseas platforms. The administration has focused on accessibility for low-value goods to stimulate consumer spending, and provide relief to the middle and lower-income populations.
“The Brazilian federal government signed a provisional measure to eliminate a 20% federal tax on international purchases valued up to US$ 50.”
The potential removal of the 'blusinhas' tax represents a shift in Brazil's approach to cross-border e-commerce, balancing the need for tax revenue against the political necessity of lowering costs for consumers. If fully implemented, the measure will likely increase the volume of low-value imports, though the conflicting reports on the government's internal consensus suggest the policy may still face legislative or administrative hurdles.




