Rep. Tabata Amaral (PSB-SP) presented a report to the Chamber of Deputies proposing a new legal definition of misogyny in March 2026.
The proposal seeks to shift the legal focus toward concrete harmful conduct rather than general sentiment. By establishing a clearer framework, the bill aims to make misogyny easier to prosecute and provides mechanisms to block online profiles that promote such behavior.
Amaral serves as the rapporteur of the misogyny bill. Her report to the working group in Brasília emphasizes the need for harsher penalties and enforceable definitions to protect women from systemic hate [1, 2]. The move follows a period of legislative momentum, as the Senate approved the bill unanimously on March 24, 2026 [3].
Despite the Senate's support, the proposal has faced public opposition and criticism. Amaral addressed these disputes by clarifying that the law does not target mere rudeness. "Ser babaca não é crime," Amaral said [2].
Other political figures have also been drawn into the debate. Amaral addressed misinformation regarding the bill's intent, saying that "Nikolas mentiu pra você de novo" [3]. She said the legislation continues to face "ataques mentirosos" [4].
The proposed legal framework focuses on the ability to dismantle digital networks used to spread misogyny. By targeting the conduct and the platforms that host it, the bill intends to reduce the prevalence of coordinated harassment against women in Brazil [1, 2].
“"Ser babaca não é crime."”
This legislative push represents an attempt by Brazil to modernize its legal code to address the specific nature of digital-age hate speech. By focusing on 'concrete conduct' and the ability to block online profiles, the government is moving toward a model of preventative digital regulation rather than relying solely on post-factum criminal penalties.
