The Liberal Party of Canada moved at least four parliamentary committee meetings to be held in camera on Thursday [1], [4].
This shift in transparency occurs less than a week after the Liberals secured a majority government [2]. The move has sparked a confrontation between the governing party and the Conservative opposition over the balance of executive power and public oversight in Ottawa.
Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer said the decision to hold meetings behind closed doors is an abuse of power. "Moving committees in camera shows that the Liberal Party is allergic to accountability," Scheer said [1].
Liberal officials said closed-door sessions are necessary to protect sensitive information. Government representatives specifically cited the need to manage a $6.6 billion IT project [3], [4].
Liberal House leader Marc Garneau said the government remains committed to ensuring parliamentary committees operate in public [3]. However, opposition members argue the timing of the move suggests a different motive. One opposition MP said the Liberals used their new power to shut down debate regarding the $6.6 billion IT project [3].
The conflict highlights a tension between the government's need for confidentiality during large-scale procurement and the public's right to witness the scrutiny of taxpayer funds. While the Liberals maintain that the sessions are a management necessity, the Conservatives view the action as a strategic effort to avoid public questioning shortly after gaining a legislative majority [1], [2].
“Moving committees in camera shows that the Liberal Party is allergic to accountability.”
The transition to closed-door sessions shortly after securing a majority government suggests a shift in how the Liberal administration intends to handle legislative scrutiny. By utilizing 'in camera' sessions for high-cost projects, the government can limit the immediate public and political fallout of controversial spending, though it risks fueling opposition narratives regarding a lack of transparency and democratic accountability.





