The Council of State issued a provisional measure in April 2026 suspending the forced transfer of pension savings to Colpensiones [1].

The ruling halts a significant shift in Colombia's retirement system, preventing the government from unilaterally moving private assets into a state-managed fund while the court determines if the move is constitutional [1], [2].

At the center of the dispute is Decree 415 [2]. This government order directed the transfer of 25 trillion pesos [2] from private pension funds to the state entity, Colpensiones. The measure would have affected more than 120,000 workers [2].

Opponents of the decree argued that the move was unconstitutional and threatened the security of individual savings. The Banco de la República said the early transfer of resources could contradict the law and affect financial markets [3].

President Gustavo Petro responded to criticisms of the decree and said, "Quieren anular la libertad" [4]. Despite the legal challenges, Jaime Dussán, the president of Colpensiones, said the decree is legal and benefits Colombian workers [3].

The court's provisional stay aims to protect the assets of contributors during the legal process. Depending on the scope of the protection, the measure may safeguard the pensions of up to 53 million Colombians [1].

The Council of State will now resolve the fundamental legality of Decree 415. Until a final ruling is reached, the funds must remain in their current accounts to avoid potential financial instability or legal breaches [1], [2].

The Council of State issued a provisional measure in April 2026 suspending the forced transfer of pension savings to Colpensiones.

This legal suspension represents a significant check on the Petro administration's attempt to centralize the pension system. By blocking the transfer of 25 trillion pesos, the court is preventing a massive liquidity shift that the central bank warned could destabilize financial markets. The final ruling will determine whether the Colombian government can prioritize state-managed social security over the private contractual rights of individual savers.