Colombian voters will head to nationwide polling stations on May 31, 2024 [1], to elect a new president and vice president.

The outcome determines the future of the country's legislative direction and the stability of ongoing peace processes. Because the vote is framed as a referendum on the outgoing administration, it will signal whether the public supports a shift toward more progressive social and economic policies.

Outgoing President Gustavo Petro, a former member of the M-19 guerrilla group, has centered his term on a comprehensive reform agenda [1]. This platform includes significant changes to labor laws, and a broader social-economic overhaul intended to reduce inequality [1].

Beyond domestic policy, the election is a test of Petro's approach to national security and peace negotiations. He has pursued talks with remaining rebel groups to end decades of internal conflict [1]. These efforts have remained a point of contention among the electorate.

Opposition to the Petro agenda has manifested in significant public unrest. Earlier this year, tens of thousands of Colombians [2] took to the streets to protest against the leftist president's reform plans [2].

These protesters argue that the proposed changes could destabilize the economy, or grant too many concessions to armed groups. The high level of mobilization indicates a deeply polarized electorate as the country decides its leadership for the next term [1].

As the vote concludes, the transition of power will depend on the ability of the new administration to either maintain or dismantle the peace frameworks established by the Petro government [1].

The election serves as a referendum on outgoing President Gustavo Petro's social reforms.

This election represents a critical juncture for Colombia's transition from a history of guerrilla warfare to a formalized state of peace. A victory for a candidate aligned with Petro would validate the 'Total Peace' strategy and labor reforms, while a victory for the opposition would likely trigger a reversal of these policies and a return to more traditional security measures.