Shishir Priyadarshi, president of the Chintan Research Foundation, said the World Trade Organization has slow decision-making processes in a recent interview [1].

The critique highlights a growing tension between the rigid, bureaucratic nature of international trade governance and the rapid pace of modern global commerce. As nations navigate volatile markets, the ability of the WTO to provide timely resolutions affects how countries develop their economic strategies.

Speaking on the TOI CXO Connect platform, Priyadarshi discussed the complexities of global trade and the rules governing the WTO [1]. He said that trade policy does not have to be complicated and suggested that the subject should be taught through relatable, real-world stories to make it accessible to a broader audience [2].

Priyadarshi focused on the gap between the theoretical framework of trade rules and their practical application. By simplifying the narrative surrounding these policies, he said that the public and policymakers could better understand the impact of global trade agreements on local economies [2].

Beyond the educational aspect, the CRF president addressed the systemic inefficiency of the WTO. He said that the organization's slow speed in making decisions is a significant hurdle in today's fast-paced global environment [2]. This sluggishness can leave countries without clear guidance or resolution during trade disputes, potentially prolonging economic instability.

The discussion also touched upon the role of India within the WTO framework [3]. Priyadarshi said how India engages with global trade rules and whether the nation's approach is viewed as obstructive or protective of its domestic interests [3].

Trade policy does not have to be complicated.

The call for a more agile WTO reflects a broader global trend where traditional multilateral institutions struggle to keep pace with digital trade and rapid geopolitical shifts. If the WTO cannot modernize its decision-making speed, member nations may increasingly turn to bilateral or regional trade agreements to bypass the deadlock, further weakening the authority of a single global trade arbiter.