Rep. Dan Goldman (D-New York) said that the U.S. should regulate all artificial intelligence companies during a recent interview with The Washington Post [1].
Goldman's comments come as he navigates a primary challenge from former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander. The lawmaker's stance on emerging technology and foreign policy serves to define his platform and differentiate him from his opponent as the 2026 election cycle progresses.
During the interview conducted by reporter Anna Liss Roy, Goldman faced a series of questions regarding the intersection of technology and law [1]. When asked specifically about the approach to AI firms, Goldman said, "Regulate them all" [1]. He said the regulation of data centers is necessary, reflecting a broader push for oversight in the infrastructure supporting AI growth [1].
Beyond technology, the interview touched upon the lawmaker's foreign policy positions. Goldman said he supports continued U.S. military aid to Israel [1]. This position remains a central point of discussion within the Democratic primary as candidates weigh the balance of diplomatic support and humanitarian concerns.
Goldman also used the session to clarify the distinctions between his legislative approach and that of Brad Lander [1]. While both candidates operate within the Democratic party, the primary contest focuses on their differing priorities regarding governance, and regulatory philosophy.
The interview was released as part of a series of policy examinations intended to inform voters ahead of the primary contest [1].
“"Regulate them all"”
Goldman's call for comprehensive AI regulation signals a move toward a more interventionist federal approach to technology. By pairing this stance with his support for military aid to Israel, he is positioning himself as a candidate who balances progressive regulatory goals with traditional national security and foreign policy alignments, a strategy aimed at securing a broad base of Democratic voters in New York.
