Disney has released a live-action remake of the film Moana starring Catherine Laga'aia and Dwayne Johnson [1, 2].

The film represents the latest effort by Disney to translate its successful animated catalog into live-action features. Because the original animated version was widely praised, the remake faces significant scrutiny regarding whether a real-world interpretation can capture the same visual and emotional appeal.

Critical reception of the project is deeply divided. Some reviewers argue the film is a success, with one report from MSN stating that the movie escapes the typical live-action remake blues and instead soars above them [2]. This perspective suggests the film works 100% [2] in its execution.

Dwayne Johnson returns to his role as the demigod Maui. Johnson said he is simply magical as demigod Maui [1]. His performance is a central point of the production, though critics disagree on whether his presence enhances or detracts from the story.

Other critics have been less forgiving of the transition. A review from Collider said that Laga'aia and Johnson fail to recapture the magic of the animated Moana in this unnecessary live-action version [3]. This sentiment is echoed by CNET, which said the film is fun yet unnecessary [1].

The most severe criticism comes from the Independent, which said the remake is a waste of everyone’s time and talent [4]. These critiques center on the idea that the original animation provided a level of artistry that cannot be replicated with live actors and digital effects.

Despite these contradictions, the film remains a major release for the studio in 2026 [1, 2, 3, 4]. The production relies heavily on the chemistry between the newcomer Laga'aia and the established star power of Johnson to draw audiences back to the story.

“Moana” is a Disney live-action remake that escapes the Disney live-action remake blues - in fact, it soars above them.

The polarized reaction to Moana reflects a growing tension in Disney's business strategy. While live-action remakes are financially lucrative, the critical backlash regarding 'unnecessary' adaptations suggests a potential saturation point for audiences. The success of the film will likely depend on whether general audiences prioritize nostalgia and star power over the artistic integrity of the original animation.