Ecovias postponed the implementation of the electronic free-flow toll system on the Anchieta-Imigrantes highway after residents launched protests [1].

The delay is significant because the system aims to replace traditional toll plazas with automated gantries to reduce traffic congestion on one of Brazil's most critical transit corridors. Local residents in São Bernardo do Campo demanded more clarity on how the new tariffs would affect their daily commutes, and overall traffic flow [3].

The automatic charging system was originally scheduled to begin July 1, 2026 [1]. However, Ecovias announced the postponement June 26, 2026 [1]. While some reports suggest the system may now start Aug. 1, 2026 [2], other sources state that no new official start date has been disclosed [1].

"A cobrança automática estava prevista para começar em 1º de julho," a spokesperson for Ecovias said [1]. The company said it needs to adjust the system before it begins charging drivers [3].

Physical infrastructure for the transition is already in place. Toll gantries have been installed at km 33 on Via Anchieta and km 29 on Rodovia dos Imigrantes [1].

The transition comes amid fluctuating costs for drivers. Ecovias previously announced a promise to reduce the tariff to R$ 19.35 per segment once the free-flow system is active [6]. This stands in contrast to recent price hikes. According to Artesp, the current tariff for the Anchieta-Imigrantes system rose from R$ 38.70 to R$ 40.60 [7]. This represents a 4.9% increase [8].

Residents have remained vocal about the impact of these costs. The protests in São Bernardo do Campo centered on the lack of transparency regarding the final pricing structure, and the potential for increased local congestion during the transition period [3].

“The automatic charging system was originally scheduled to begin July 1, 2026.”

The tension between Ecovias and local residents highlights the difficulty of implementing automated infrastructure when it coincides with price increases. By delaying the free-flow launch, the operator is attempting to mitigate public backlash and technical instability, but the discrepancy between the promised future rate of R$ 19.35 and the current R$ 40.60 fee creates a financial incentive for residents to oppose any system that does not immediately lower costs.