The European Union and Israel are negotiating a draft agreement to exchange extensive personal and police data [1].

The deal is under scrutiny because it may compromise human-rights standards and breach both EU and international law. Privacy advocates argue that the scale of the proposed data transfer exceeds legal boundaries for security cooperation.

According to reports, the draft agreement covers five categories of personal information [1]. These include biometric data and genetic information. The deal also encompasses location tracking and the political views of individuals [1].

The exchange would allow police forces to share these personal details across borders. This level of surveillance capability has drawn criticism from legal experts who said the arrangement ignores established privacy protections, particularly those mandated by EU regulations.

Critics argue that sharing such sensitive information with Israel could lead to human-rights violations. They said that the lack of transparency regarding the negotiations further undermines the legality of the proposed framework [1].

Neither the European Union nor Israeli officials have provided a detailed public response to these specific legal concerns. The negotiations remain focused on expanding police cooperation through the exchange of these five data types [1].

The EU and Israel are negotiating a draft agreement to exchange extensive personal and police data.

This agreement represents a significant expansion of surveillance cooperation between the EU and Israel. By including political views and genetic data, the deal moves beyond traditional criminal intelligence into the realm of deep personal profiling. If implemented, it could set a precedent for how the EU shares sensitive biometric data with non-EU states, potentially clashing with the bloc's strict General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and international human-rights treaties.