Dr. Anthony S. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right to avoid answering questions during a U.S. Senate hearing on the origins of COVID-19 [1].

The move prevents the committee from obtaining direct testimony on the pandemic's start, a central point of contention between public health officials and lawmakers.

The hearing took place on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. [2]. During the proceedings, Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, faced questioning from Republican senators regarding the origins of the virus [1].

Reports indicate that Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times [3], though other reports state he did so more than 100 times [4]. This legal protection allows a witness to refuse to answer questions that could lead to self-incrimination.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) criticized the refusal to provide testimony. "He’s refusing to answer basic questions that the American people deserve answers to," Paul said [2].

Some observers suggested the repeated use of the amendment was a strategic move by legal counsel. Josh Hammer, a senior editor-at-large at Newsweek, said the fact that Fauci felt compelled to plead the Fifth shows that his lawyers were scared he would perjure himself over and over again [5].

Other reports described the action as a standard legal protection against self-incrimination [1]. The hearing focused on the timeline and nature of the pandemic's emergence, a topic that has remained a source of intense political debate in the U.S. for years.

"He’s refusing to answer basic questions that the American people deserve answers to."

The decision by a high-ranking public health official to invoke the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in a congressional setting is rare and typically signals a high level of legal risk. By prioritizing protection against self-incrimination over public transparency, Fauci has effectively blocked this specific legislative avenue for uncovering the origins of COVID-19, likely fueling further political calls for contempt charges or alternative investigative methods.