U.S. special envoy Jared Kushner said Hamas could be very close to laying down its weapons as part of cease-fire negotiations [1].

This potential disarmament represents a significant shift in the Israel-Palestine conflict, as the surrender of arms by Hamas would fundamentally alter the security landscape of the Gaza Strip and the prospects for a long-term peace agreement.

Kushner said during a Fox News interview with foreign correspondent Trey Yingst that the militant group is nearing a decision to disarm [1]. This sentiment was echoed in a report from The Times of Israel Daily Briefing, which said that Hamas had signaled it was ready to put its arms on the table [2].

The reports surfaced on July 31, 2026 [2]. While the Fox News report framed the development as a possibility, the briefing from The Times of Israel described the agreement more definitively [1, 2].

These developments come amid broader international pressure to end the hostilities. Anwar Ibrahim, the Prime Minister of Malaysia, said the United States must press all parties toward a genuine cease-fire and the disarmament of militant groups [3].

Efforts by the U.S. and other regional actors have focused on securing a cease-fire, and the release of hostages held in the Gaza Strip [1, 3]. The disarmament of Hamas has long been a central demand for Israeli security officials, though the process of verification and implementation remains a complex diplomatic hurdle.

Despite the signals reported in July 2026, the path to a final agreement involves navigating the competing demands of regional stakeholders, and the internal politics of the warring parties [1, 3].

"Hamas could be very close to laying down its weapons."

The reported willingness of Hamas to disarm suggests a potential pivot from military governance to a different political status. However, the discrepancy between speculative and definitive reporting on the matter indicates that while signals are being sent, a formal, verified agreement for disarmament has not yet been finalized. Such a move would likely require significant international guarantees to ensure the safety of those surrendering weapons.