The Indian government introduced the Public Examinations (Amendment) Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha on Monday, July 27 [1].

This legislative move follows widespread criticism and student protests regarding the NEET-UG exam. The government seeks to dismantle organized fraud networks that compromise the integrity of national competitive examinations.

Union Education Minister Prahlad Joshi led the introduction of the bill during the Monsoon Session of Parliament [2]. The legislation proposes a rigorous framework to curb paper leaks, including the establishment of fast-track courts and time-bound investigations [3]. To ensure systemic oversight, the bill introduces a Special Task Force, and increases the accountability of officials and agencies involved in exam administration [3].

The proposed penalties for organized exam fraud are significant. The bill suggests a maximum imprisonment term of 10 years [4]. Additionally, the legislation introduces a maximum fine of ₹10 crore for those found guilty of orchestrating organized fraud [5].

These measures come as the government attempts to restore public trust in the examination system. The bill is part of a broader effort to modernize exam reforms, following the announcement of a task force led by Nandan Nilekani to address the backlash from previous exam irregularities [6].

Opposition members in the Lok Sabha are expected to challenge the bill as it moves toward a vote. The government has provided draft copies of the legislation to members of parliament to facilitate debate during the current session [7].

The bill proposes a maximum imprisonment term of 10 years.

The introduction of this bill signals a shift from administrative penalties to criminal deterrence in India's education sector. By implementing high financial penalties and lengthy prison terms, the government is treating exam leaks as a serious organized crime rather than a mere procedural failure. The success of the bill will depend on whether the proposed Special Task Force and fast-track courts can actually reduce the timeframe between the detection of a leak and the conviction of the perpetrators.