Iran warned Monday that uncoordinated transit through the Strait of Hormuz could jeopardize global oil shipments [1, 2, 3].
Because the strait is a narrow maritime passage between Iran and Oman linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman, any disruption threatens the flow of energy to global markets [1, 2, 3].
Ali Bagheri, a spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, said safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz depends on respect for Iranian sovereignty and coordination with Tehran [1]. The government said it seeks a change in U.S. regional behavior and policies that affect energy prices [1, 2, 3].
Senior Iranian official Mohammad Reza Aghazadeh said Tehran intends to block Israeli ships from using the strait and will seek compensation from hostile countries [3]. These statements follow earlier remarks from Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, who said on Aug. 12 that Iran would keep the strait closed until the U.S. changes its behavior [2].
These warnings contrast with other reported communications between the two nations. Iran has told the U.S. it has no plans to close or toll the Strait of Hormuz [4].
Tehran continues to use the potential restriction of traffic as leverage in its dealings with the U.S., and its allies [1, 2, 3]. The Iranian government said the security of the waterway is tied to the recognition of its territorial authority [1].
“"Safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz depends on respect for our sovereignty and coordination with Tehran."”
The conflicting messages from Tehran suggest a dual-track strategy of diplomatic signaling and strategic deterrence. By alternating between assurances of openness and threats of closure, Iran utilizes its geographic control over one of the world's most vital energy chokepoints to pressure the U.S. into policy concessions regarding regional sovereignty and sanctions.
