Iran and Oman are reportedly close to a deal to divide navigation channels in the Strait of Hormuz [1, 2].

The agreement would fundamentally alter the movement of maritime traffic through one of the world's most critical oil transit chokepoints. By splitting the waterway, the two nations aim to establish a more structured division of control and transit responsibility.

According to reports, the proposed plan would replace the current open and unified strait with two distinct routes. One channel would skirt the coast of Iran, while a second channel would skirt the coast of Oman [1, 2].

Michael Ware of News24 said that Tehran and Oman likely engaged in talks throughout the weekend and that both sides feel very close to a final agreement [2]. He said that the parties are moving toward dividing what was previously a unified body of water [2].

The negotiations have progressed amid a shift in regional military dynamics. The movement toward a deal comes as the U.S. has suspended a specific attack plan, reducing immediate military pressure on Iran [1].

This strategic realignment follows prolonged negotiations between the two neighbors. The creation of separate channels is intended to clarify territorial navigation rights, and manage the flow of vessels through the narrow passage [1, 2].

“Tehran and Oman must’ve been in talks all weekend, and both sides are saying that they feel very close.”

A formal division of the Strait of Hormuz would mark a significant shift in maritime governance in the Persian Gulf. By establishing separate channels, Iran and Oman may seek to reduce the risk of accidental naval confrontations and clarify sovereign jurisdiction over shipping lanes. This move, coinciding with a reduction in U.S. military pressure, suggests a pivot toward regional bilateralism to manage stability in a high-tension corridor.