Iran is currently reviewing a draft understanding with the U.S. but has not yet issued a formal response [1, 2].

The delay in negotiations highlights the deep diplomatic rift between the two nations. Because the agreement could shift the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East, the specific conditions demanded by Tehran may determine whether the draft leads to a lasting peace or further stalemate.

Iranian officials said that a fundamental lack of trust between the two parties is the primary obstacle to a quick agreement [1, 2]. This deficit of trust has led Tehran to insist on concrete steps that guarantee real gains before it signs any formal document [1, 2].

Among the primary demands are the permanent end to the war, and the comprehensive lifting of sanctions [1, 2]. Iranian sources said that the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is a critical requirement for further progress in the talks [1, 2].

Tehran is treating the draft as a starting point rather than a final agreement. The Iranian government said it will not provide a response until it sees verifiable actions from Washington that mitigate the risks of future diplomatic reversals [1, 2].

The U.S. has not yet commented on the specific demands regarding the Strait of Hormuz or the timeline for sanction relief. The current phase of negotiations remains focused on bridging the gap between the proposed draft and the practical guarantees requested by the Iranian side [1, 2].

“Tehran is reviewing a draft understanding with Washington and has not yet sent a response.”

The insistence on 'concrete steps' before signing indicates that Iran is unwilling to rely on written promises alone. By linking the agreement to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the removal of sanctions, Tehran is seeking to secure tangible economic and strategic advantages to ensure the U.S. cannot unilaterally withdraw from the deal in the future.