Iran warned that the Strait of Hormuz is unsafe and will remain closed while the United States maintains a naval blockade [1].

As one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints, any disruption to the Strait of Hormuz threatens global energy supplies and risks escalating military conflict between Washington and Tehran.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy and Iran's joint military command issued the warning, stating the waterway cannot be considered safe under current U.S. actions [1, 2]. The IRGC Navy said ships approaching the vital waterway "will be targeted" [1].

Tehran has demanded that the U.S., led by President Donald Trump, end what it describes as a naval blockade that threatens Iranian shipping and regional security [1, 3]. Iran's joint military command said control of the Strait will only be returned when the United States accepts Iran's conditions [2].

According to a spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry, the U.S. must pledge never to threaten Tehran again and permanently end its war with Iran and its regional allies [3]. The Iranian government said the waterway will stay closed until the U.S. corrects its behavior and ceases its war-like actions [3].

This escalation follows accusations from Tehran that the U.S. violated a previous deal to reopen the waterway [2]. While some reports suggest Iran has set specific conditions for reopening the Strait following the targeting of a UAE-flagged ship, the official stance remains that the passage is unsafe [2, 3].

The Strait of Hormuz serves as the narrow connection between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, making it the primary exit point for oil exports from the region [1, 2].

"Ships approaching the vital waterway 'will be targeted'."

The standoff over the Strait of Hormuz places global oil markets at significant risk, as the waterway is the primary artery for Persian Gulf energy exports. By linking maritime access to broader political demands—including a permanent end to U.S. regional military actions—Iran is using its geographic leverage to force a shift in U.S. foreign policy. This creates a high-stakes environment where a single tactical miscalculation by either the U.S. Navy or the IRGC could trigger a full-scale naval conflict.