A new book said Justice Elena Kagan screamed at Justice Stephen Breyer during the 2022 Dobbs decision leak, shaking the U.S. Supreme Court’s conference‑room wall. [1]

The claim matters because it suggests deep internal turmoil among the nation’s highest court at a moment when the Dobbs ruling upended nearly five decades of abortion jurisprudence. If true, the outburst could signal how the leak intensified partisan pressure on the justices and shaped public confidence in the Court. [2]

The book’s author said the episode was a sudden, ear‑splitting yell that caused “the wall was shaking.” The author said, as reported by Fox News. A Fox News reporter said the description, noting that Kagan yelled at Justice Breyer so loudly the wall trembled. [2]

According to the author, the incident occurred in the U.S. Supreme Court’s conference room as justices debated the fallout of the leak that revealed the Court’s intent to overturn Roe v. Wade. The leak, which surfaced in 2022, sent shockwaves through the nation and ignited fierce political battles on both sides of the abortion debate. [1]

The book does not provide audio or video evidence, and no official court transcript records the alleged shout. Court officials have not confirmed the incident, and the justices have not commented publicly. The claim therefore rests solely on the author’s account, which appears in secondary reporting by Fox News and MSN. [1] The lack of corroboration means the story should be treated with caution.

Fact‑checkers rate the overall confidence in the claim at 35 percent, reflecting the limited source material and the absence of direct verification. Readers are advised to consider the claim’s tentative nature and to await any further evidence that may emerge from court insiders or future investigations. [1]

“"the wall was shaking," the author said, as reported by Fox News.”

If the account is accurate, it reveals how the Dobbs leak not only reshaped legal precedent but also provoked intense emotional reactions within the Court, potentially influencing future deliberations and public perception of judicial impartiality.